| HOME | REDUCTION OF SERVICES | casiNOs | OCGC | PORT JERVIS | VALLEY VIEW | EQUAL JUSTICE | POLICE ABUSE & MISCONDUCT | D.A.R.T. |

SOME BACKGROUND

LAWSUIT PENDING
ORANGE COUNTY LEGISLATIVE VOTE ON OCGC


CLICK IMAGE FOR FULL STATEMENT ON PENDING
LEGAL ACTION


STATEMENT ON ILLEGAL WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY

PENDING LEGISLATIVE VOTE
LAW SUIT WILL FOLLOW



  CLICK HERE TO READ STORY ...

 
  MORE ON PAUL RUDLOPH ...
 
  RUDOLPH FOUNDATION ...
 
  NATIONAL TRUST LETTER ...
 
  ORANGE ARTS ...
 
  KAUFMAN PLAN ...
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LAWSUITS TO SAVE THE
PAUL RUDOLPH ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER


— BLOCK-BUSTER designLAB Architect's
RESIGNATION LETTER TO PHIL CLARK
OF CPL MADE PUBLIC

— DEC IGNORES CLEAR PROOF OF ADDITIONAL SOIL DISTURBANCE AND ILLEGAL SEGMENTATION


Although the DEC decision to not require a SPDES Permit and a SWPPP took place in April 2015, the DEC never saw a site plan until a fraudulent plan was generated by Phil Clark on 17 July 2015.

The DEC received that plan subsequently, and reaffirmed their previous improper decision. They also ignored:

1. two independent SOIL STUDIES undertaken for the County and CPL, respectively which established the NEED for replacement of unstable soils at various locations on the project site;

2. the need for flood mitigation and the installation of significant flood mitigation infrastructure requiring substantial SOIL DISTURBANCE [the same soil studies];

3. they also ignored statements by engineers for the manufacturer of "TuffTrack Greenway Pavers" who declared that the material used to justify 0 SF of soil disturbance for a 64,000 SF parking facility is:

  • Unsuitable for Municipal Parking;
  • Unsuitable for Daily Vehicular Traffic;
  • Requires significant Flood Mitigation and Flood Control Infrastructure [Soil Disturbance] when installed over impervious soils;
  • Cannot be plowed in winter closer than 2 inches above the installation;
  • Requires the Heavy Duty version of the recommended installation needing 8 inches of excavation [more Soil Disturbance];
  • GRASS WILL NOT GROW IN THE CELLS WITH DAILY USE.

The latest slap in the face to Orange County Taxpayers is the failure of the County DPW to release for inspection the OFFICIAL SITE PLAN AS IT EXISTS AS PART OF THE PUBLISHED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CONTEXT WITH THOSE DOCUMENTS.

EVEN WORSE, while we contend that the DEC has never seen the real site plan, and maintain that the plan given to them after 17 July 2015 is fraudulent and deficient, an OCDPW letter states that the Office of Court Administration which has a signing authority on the project and a funding component [BOTH OF WHICH SHOULD TRIGGER FEDERAL OVERSIGHT UNDER SECTION 106 REVIEW WHEN COMBINED WITH OVER 1 ACRE OF SOIL DISTURBANCE] is preventing public access to the CERTIFIED construction documents untill 27 AUGUST.

— WHAT WILL BE LEFT TO PROTECT ON 27 AUGUST?

— DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS!


SOMETHING STINKS HERE!


designLAB RESIGNATION/OCA STOPS FOIL RELEASE


THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TELLS
JUDGE CAHILL:
NO DESTRUCTION IS IMMINENT


What does
this
look like?


ARTICLE 78 PETITION   4th OF JULY FLYER

The County and DEC say that no soil disturbance will take place here where a new parking lot will be constructed in this field which is currently blooming with clover and alfalfa.


REVISED SEQRA   EXPERT ANALYSIS

SEQRA
Smoke & Mirrors


< Orange County tries to evade regulatory oversight by proposed deficient SEQRA.

Litigants review of manipulated SEQRA shows soil disturbance over 1 acre, i.e. regulatory oversight is mandated. >


SECTION 51 LITIGATION UNDER GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW


ORDER & DECISION
< On June 18th a notice was received of Judge Cahill's ORDER & DECISION.

On, June 23, 2015, on notice to County respondents, we presented an Order to Show Cause to the Appellate Division, seeking to enjoin the proposed demolition of the Orange County Government Center in Goshen, New York.

The law secretary advised us that the Court would expedite the return date on our motion, causing respondents to respond by June 26 and providing us no time for reply.

In light of the misrepresentations which characterize the respondents' papers, I feel constrained to write this letter and request leave that it be provided to the members of the Motion panel for their consideration. >

APPEAL RESPONSE TO OC

VERIFIED COMPLAINT
PRESS RELEASE
MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Please click the image above to have the complete press briefing streamed to your computer.


     
 

 


Click the image below to view video of rejected proposal for alternative Kaufman Plan